Karvaan India
  • High Five
  • Reportage
  • Heritage
  • Foreign Press
  • Reviews
  • Opinion
  • Karvaan Urdu
  • Membership
    • Member Login
    • My Bookmarks
    • My Profile
  • Mind Matters
Reading: India’s encounters with secular v/s anti-secular rhetoric
Subscribe
Aa
Karvaan IndiaKarvaan India
  • High Five
  • Reportage
  • Heritage
  • Foreign Press
  • Reviews
  • Opinion
  • Karvaan Urdu
  • Membership
  • Mind Matters
Search
  • High Five
  • Reportage
  • Heritage
  • Foreign Press
  • Reviews
  • Opinion
  • Karvaan Urdu
  • Membership
    • Member Login
    • My Bookmarks
    • My Profile
  • Mind Matters

Popular Posts

Health and Well Being

Survivors of Bhopal Gas Tragedy Demand Justice for Health Impact on Future Generations

Uncategorized

‘Education must be Muslim priority’

Features

The Fundamentalist Ghetto

Subscribe to our newsletter

Help us remain independent and truthful
Follow US
Copyright 2023. Civis Stories | All Rights Reserved
Karvaan India > Story > Magazine > India’s encounters with secular v/s anti-secular rhetoric
MagazinePolitics

India’s encounters with secular v/s anti-secular rhetoric

By jahfer 29 June 2020 6 Min Read
Share

Ideological adherence to Hindutva premised on Brahmanical dominance is the rule of law that has seemingly been the prelude to an officially ethnic state or de jure Hindu state. In such a nation, Bahujan bodies are being dominated on a daily basis where nationalism has always been a construction of the mainstream that identifies itself as the essential core of the nation. In other words, it is the mainstream which defines the ‘soul’, ‘natural’ or ‘integral’ part of the land.

Often, on the question of citizenship, the idea of citizens v/s people is deployed. Further elaborating, Dipankar Gupta writes: “The tension is between citizens and people. Under nationalism, being “a people” means more than an aggregation of citizens. In a liberal democracy, however, it is not the people but citizens that take precedence.” As any decolonized nation-state, India too had to choose either the memories of blood and soil or the national identity based on citizenship. Although the latter was chosen, the postcolonial experience of roughly seven decades shows the majoritarian mobilization against the citizens by the people whose exclusive right over the holy land is asserted right from the birth of nationalism in the subcontinent. Whatever the liberal promises that had been made to the citizens appeared to have become invisible or made to disappear from the public conscience. 

India as a nation-state ought to be seen through the paradoxes of gross poverty existing together with democracy, of diversity with the liberal constitution, and anarchy with polity. From this premise, the argument over secularism also appears to have some food for thought. 

Nehruvian secularism, along with its shortcomings, determined the postcolonial reality to an extent. Though secular, it is under his leadership the Hindu Code Bill was enacted which expanded the legal notion of being a Hindu. Anyone who doesn’t belong to Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Zoroastrianism, is deemed to have been included in the definition of Hindu. Similarly, the Presidential Order of 1950 continues to hold that “no person who professes a religion different from the Hindu [the Sikh or the Buddhist] religion shall be deemed to be a member of a Scheduled Caste.” Hence, it would be a dramatic misreading that the Nehruvian secularism has had a rupture with the traditional society in which religious affiliation is the primary manifestation of social identity. 

There have been attempts to carve out an anti-secular manifesto to counter the shortcomings of Nehruvian secularism. Gurharpal Singh observes: “While many things divide the anti-secularists, they share two common characteristics: most are neo Gandhians; secondly, and far more importantly they occupy leading positions in the charmed circles of postcolonial theory.” 

During the 1980s, the Hindutva organizations had gained the upper hand among the middle classes across Hindu society. Public Intellectuals, at the time, argued for an alternative method to combat the rise of Hindutva in the polity by adopting an approach of religious tolerance deriving mainly from India’s indigenous syncretic tradition. Ashish Nandy, who then was a leading advocate of the same, called for serious consideration as to how diversity could be politically managed. 

Singh further argued that some had even taken the task to reproduce the orientalist construction of Hinduism, its inclusivist interpretations, and tolerance from Nandy’s thought. As Peter van der Veer noted in his book Religious Nationalism: Hindus and Muslims in India, tolerance is an inadequate term to define Hindu inclusivism which essentially is a form of hierarchical relativism. 

“An important underlying concept here is that of hierarchy. The many gods and paths” he writes “are manifestations of the One who is formless, but some of these manifestations are higher than others (p, 68).” Precisely, the idea behind reclaiming the syncretic tradition is that of accommodating the “inferior beings”.

The question that needs to be repeatedly asked is, in fact about the compliance and conformity within the thoughts of secular liberals as well as its syncretic critics. Interestingly but not surprisingly, both sides are being occupied by Savarnas who mistakenly believe that they have been making a seriously radical proposition foreseeing fundamental changes in the polity.

Even if Bahujans are being accommodated under either of these Savarna categories, the inherently hierarchical social order supersedes at any cost. Like the Gandhian search for inter-religious truth lacked appeal amongst Muslims and lower castes during the colonial period, neo-Gandhians” religious tolerance’ has hardly been compassionate.

Apart from the conventional notions of democracy and secularism, a serious problematization of the same is indeed necessary. At least for the Bahujans, who vaguely constitute the lion’s share of the population across religious communities, it is a struggle to reclaim the public space with slogans that matter to them, to demand equitable distribution of state resources, to become economically self-reliant, and also to live, of course, with dignity.

Subscribe

Monthly plan starting at ₹199 (grants access to all reportage)

As an independent media outlet, we rely on your support to be the people’s voice, free from the sway of big money. Our commitment is to deliver top-notch journalism centred around you and the issues you care about. Join us today to ensure our independence and receive quality news coverage. Subscribe now!

Monthly

Monthly plan starting at ₹199 (grants access to all reportage). Cancel anytime.

₹199/month
Unlimited Access to all reportage and cover stories.Access to all digital contentCancel any timePremium support
Subscribe Now
TAGGED: Anti-Secular, Bahujan, Dipankargupta, Hinducodebill, Hindustate, Indiam Nationalism, Presendentialorder, Secular

Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter

Embark on a transformative journey of personal growth and adaptation in our enlightening newsletter, exploring insights and solutions for navigating a dynamic world.
Newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram Email Copy Link Print

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter!

Embark on a transformative journey of personal growth and adaptation in our enlightening newsletter, exploring insights and solutions for navigating a dynamic world.

Newsletter

Subscribe

Monthly plan starting at ₹200 (grants access to all reportage)

As an independent media outlet, we rely on your support to be the people’s voice, free from the sway of big money. Our commitment is to deliver top-notch journalism centred around you and the issues you care about. Join us today to ensure our independence and receive quality news coverage. Subscribe now!

Subscribe Now

READ MORE

Health and Well Being

Survivors of Bhopal Gas Tragedy Demand Justice for Health Impact on Future Generations

24 June 2023

‘Education must be Muslim priority’

3 April 2019

The Fundamentalist Ghetto

3 April 2019

Vehement religious discrimination is the new norm in India

3 April 2019

You Might Also Like

Politics

Hindu Crisis, Muslim Cost

By abhishekmajumdar 10 June 2023
Magazine

Oversights and Omissions: Response to Urvashi Butalias Indian Express Article

By uzma 10 June 2023
EssaysMagazine

Bihar Election: Diary of a First Time Voter

By aditiagarwal 3 November 2020
Politics

Hindu Sena does it again: Yajna for Trumps re-election

By editdesk 3 November 2020

Follow US: 

Quick Access

  • About us
  • Submission
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Careers

Subscription

  • Subscribe Now
  • My Profile
  • My Bookmarks
  • Member Login
  • Terms And Conditions

Cookies Notice

We use our own and third-party cookies to improve our services, personalise your advertising and remember your preferences.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?